Insurgency, Complexity and the Moro Problem (Part 3 of 3)

iu-1The The goal of the MILF: the control of contested space

The goal of the MILF is, among other things, the control over contested political space in Mindanao. It is not to replace or supplant the Government of the Republic of the Philippines. Unlike the Communist Party of the Philippines/National Democratic Front/New Peoples Army (CPP/NDF/NPA) which has publicly avowed its intention to place a unit in every barangay and put up a shadow parallel government with the intention of “smashing” the Philippine State,  the intention of the MILF is to see to it that Philippine State does not have control or has diminished control over the contested political space. As long as the government is seen as having minimal control over the contested political space or that the people feel alienated and see the government as the source of their troubles or that government security forces are “occupational forces”, then the goal of control is already achieved.

The goal of Philippine Government: secure environment, sustainable development

Are the goals of government different from the MILF? No. They have similar goals in the sense that government wants to control the contested political space as well, as any sovereign government should. But unlike the MILF which seeks control over the political space by virtue of what they see as a historic and just right to self-determination, government’s intention is fueled by its nation-building goals, i.e. building a “psychologically and physically secure environment conducive to equitable and sustainable development.”

Now, those are big words. But in simple terms, I think that means that government wants some measure of “control” (since full control is not feasible) over the contested space. That is the raison d’être for the existence of a State. Thus, government’s agenda is to secure the people and their communities, bring livelihood and development, make sure basic services are delivered, that governance is transparent, effective and accountable. In other words, Government must set free the people: free from fear, free from want. Whatever Government’s political objectives are, i.e. peace and development, etc., its functional objective is to impose a measure of “control” on the contested political space. Obviously, “control” does not mean that Philippine Government has “unquestioned dominance”. It just simply means that Philippine Government must see to it that the MILF and all other political, economic and military actors in the conflict areas work and collaborate with government towards the attainment of shared objectives.

In the lingo of USAID, for example, the measure of success will be measured by Government’s “effectiveness” and “legitimacy” in the four broad areas of identity, security, governance and economic development. “Effectiveness” means that we have both the capability and the capacity to deliver on what is essentially the State’s social contract with its people: the provision of respect of identity, security, economic development and governance. “Legitimacy” means that whatever we do in the contested space must be perceived and felt by the Bangsamoro people as for his or her best interest. Our Government must be seen as truly the Government not only of Christians but also of the Bangsamoro people.

As I see it, the Philippine Government, in the future, must focus on 4 areas: identity, security, governance and economic development.

Identity. At the heart of the armed conflict is the action in defense of identity. It is an intangible “good”. From the questions of identity flows passion, emotions, and drive. Identity demands acknowledgment and respect. The State must be able to provide an environment where people’s identities are respected, listened to and protected.

Security. The provision of basic security to the people includes (1) military security (securing the population from attack or intimidation by insurgents, bandits, terrorists or other armed groups), (2) police security (community policing, police intelligence and paramilitary police field forces), human security, building a framework of human rights, civil institutions and civilian protection, and (3) public safety (fire, ambulance, sanitation, civil defense) and population security. Security is not the exclusive domain of the military and police. It is also the domain of civilians. The protection of human rights is a fundamental element of security. Security is also not the basis for economic and political progress. It cannot be “security first” and then livelihood and governance later. The three areas must develop simultaneously.

Governance. Governance focuses on mobilizing support from the people. A key element is the building of institutional capacity in all agencies of government and non-government civil institutions. Essentially, it means that a transparent and accountable governance must exist in the contested space. In fact, in the contested political space, we just have to make sure that ARMM is present and works.

Economic Development and Livelihood. Economic development includes a near-term component of immediate humanitarian relief, rehabilitation, sustainable livelihood as well as longer-term programs for development reconstruction in the contested space. A major element on this front is to resolve the multiple claims and disputes over land in the contested political space. Land is very central to the conflict in Mindanao.

President Aquino’s National Security Policy: 4 Key Elements

President Aquino’s National Security Policy (as articulated by Peace Adviser Deles) is focused on the so-called 4 key elements:

“With this commitment, the present administration puts primacy in the peace process by focusing its National Security Policy on four (4) key elements:

1. Governance. – Good governance entails being present and accountable to the citizens especially those living in the poorest and most remote areas. Further, this means putting an end to the long history of patronage politics and ensuring that our next leaders are freely elected by the people. As we help the people realize their power to vote, we strengthen their faith in democratic processes and the rule of law. Likewise, we enable them to hold their elected leaders accountable for the public trust they have given them.

2. Delivery of Basic Services. – Conflict resolution must be done along with delivery of basic services, particularly health and education, to depressed and vulnerable barangays in conflict areas, putting into place effective and transparent mechanisms to ensure that aid will reach those in need. Government programs that build access roads and school buildings for basic and adult education; provide potable water and sanitation facilities, basic health care, electricity; assist in shelter reconstruction, and provide temporary livelihood interventions must be renewed.

3. Economic Reconstruction and Sustainable Development. – No conflict area will be left behind. The economic reconstruction of conflict-affected areas, particularly the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM), should be fully-integrated in all national development plans to bring the blessings of peace to its people and set it on its way to sustainable development as a valuable contributor to our national movement towards progress.

4. Security Sector Reform. – Enhancing the Security Sector must begin with restoring the pride and honor of our uniformed services. This requires strong, capable and disciplined security forces serving under firm democratic civilian control to achieve and sustain peace and security in the country.”

Negotiations

Of course, the “big elephant” in the room is negotiations. These 4 key elements must support (and not replace) the primary efforts for a negotiated political settlement with the MILF. We must be however not think that these 4 key elements can solve the problem. Without traction and progress in the negotiations with the MILF, the 4 key elements will be useless.

Why? Because in order to successfully implement the elements, the MILF and other conflict actors must be on board. It cannot be done unilaterally by the Philippine Government. Thus, negotiations can also be viewed as a process to install an overall system of “cooperation”, i.e. actors working and collaborating to achieve the same objective rather than war, between the Government and the MILF. This is why peace negotiations is important. As long as the MILF and its combatants see a viable and honest-to-goodness peace process that will in the end address the root causes of the Moro problems, then collaboration between the government and the MILF will continue and war can be averted. If the talks bogged down, the so-called activities in the “complementary” track, e.g.PAMANA, will not take off. They will be viewed by the MILF and other actors as a ploy to defeat the insurgency. (end)

Advertisements

Author: Bong Montesa

I teach children how to think. I am engage in the work of ending armed conflicts and bring about a just, inclusive and sustainable peace in the Philippines and in the world.

1 thought on “Insurgency, Complexity and the Moro Problem (Part 3 of 3)”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s